-----Original Message----- >From: john barrick <astroboy@...> >Sent: Jun 14, 2007 10:34 AM >To: Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [Mellotronists] Re: Strings Preference, Preamps, Heads too > >Martin (or Jerry, Frank, etc.), >has anyone with an M400 swapped out their stock heads for High Z ones >and impleted a tube/valve preamp? I assume that the new preamp would >take up more room and need to be placed elsewhere in the cabinet. >Would this be an exercise in futility, or should one, via this method, >be able to get "the sound"? > >john __________________________________________________________________________________________ Hi John, Reverse-engineering a MK-II headblock into an M400 model , plus adding tube preamp is an undertaking, to properly implement. The Pindertron for Frank S. in SD had hi-Z heads, mated to solid-state preamp using impedance matching isolated line transformers (3 of 'em). And the MK-VI and MK-VII produced by Markus Resch uses tube preamp mated to Low-Z headblock. Main reason for switch to Low-Z heads was the noise/interference from Hi-Z units. Was an often observed fact that SSCU pulses broke thru into the audio. Bringing one's hand near any of input cables would induce a terrible buzzing, when orig. mated to tube/valve preamp. TIDBIT : One individual tapehead from MK-II has same reading as ENTIRE M400 headblock array. The valve preamp requires high-voltage DC (about 250-300 nominal) for B+ biasing , plus 6.3-7.0 VAC (or rectified DC) for tube heater(s). SFX thru MK-V models only require filtered/clean 30VDC (18VDC w. low-noise mod). Hope this info is of help. Cheers, -- Jerry Korb at the Mellotron Ranch
Message
Re: [Mellotronists] Re: Strings Preference, Preamps, Heads too
2007-06-14 by jkorb@ix.netcom.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.