Mellotronists group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Mellotronists

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:09 UTC

Message

Re: [Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...

2005-04-23 by Andy Thompson

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jack Younger" <e4103s@...>
To: <Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 12:59 AM
Subject: [Mellotronists] 'Tron hate...


> Hello again,
>      I love to watch the fur fly!  Scathing commentary!

Nah, this isn't fur flying...  :-)

>      I have a friend as well, who swears by the sample.  He also swears by
> protools and I, in turn, swear at him, as a result.  At one point, during
a heated
> analog vs digital argument, of which we seem to have an unending supply, I
> mentioned recently aquiring my EMI.  He came over with his infernal laptop
> and we set to comparing the two through my studio's monitors.  To his
> embarassment, the real thing won, of course.  More body and dynamics.  The
> samples were flat and grainy, while the EMI seemed to breathe the notes
forth
> like surging ocean waves.  We have not argued about such things since.
> Mellotron - 1, Sampletank - 0.

Heh heh heh. Yeah, when neo-prog troupe Galahad (stop laughing at the back)
recorded with mine a few years back, they were of a mind to only replace the
already-recorded 'Tron string samples, leaving the choirs, "'Cos they sound
fine". Until the dreaded A-B comparison. Heh heh heh. Cue replacement of all
samples.

>      I hope to make a few of my more Mellotron-oriented albums available
by
> MP3 shortly, so that I may enjoy the spit and daggers of opinion, as well.
The
> reviews from this group are always so refreshingly raw and unabashed.

I've obviously missed a posting here, Jack - what's available, and where can
I get it?

Andy T.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.