> Concerning the tape widths: Somebody posted that MA\ufffds tapes were > slightly wider than standard in Gordon\ufffds test. That is not correct. MA > has been supplying 100\ufffds of M400 tape sets that we have cut ourselves > since the early 90\ufffds, so naturally we know what width will fit the 400. > The MkVI has very exactly cut guides, so naturally it needs tapes that > are precision-cut to 3/8 inch. Can I offer contrary opinion here? DK sent me a set of tapes about four years ago whose width varied wildly across the length of the tape and through which on track A I could hear mostly A but partly B, on B I could hear some B with a smattering of C and on C I could hear mostly nothing at all. Several of the tapes stuck in the guides and many of them appeared to have been manually trimmed. In David's defence he gave me the tapes for nothing but to tell me and everyone here that 'naturally we know what width will fit the 400' is simply not borne out by experience. I still have the tape reels here and can supply scans to the group on request if I am to be disbelieved. FWIW, when we spoke I found David to be a very likeable and personable chap. It seems that his greatest wish was to have a sit down and a chat over a beer with John Bradley. Mike Dickson (tron@...) M400 #996 The Official Cynic of Streetly Electronics Streetly Sample Library http://www.blackcat.demon.co.uk/tron/
Message
[Mellotronists] MA tape frames
2005-10-21 by tron@blackcat.demon.co.uk
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.