Yeah. The Enzo, 1 million+ and only to those invited to purchase. 15K for a brake job on those ceramic disks etc. EEEEK. Mark --- tony <amoffet1@...> wrote: > Yea I know exactlly about the Ferrari secrets and > that's all I'll say, aside from good things come to > those who wait. > > Tony > #510 > Ferrari 575M 130837 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: MAinPsych@... > To: Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 12:18 PM > Subject: Re: [Mellotronists] RE: M-4000? > > > In a message dated 3/5/2006 7:29:14 AM Pacific > Standard Time, djacques@... writes: > What I don't understand is with everyone is so > damn upset with Martin regarding his dissing of the > group, why don't you just go out a but the Mellotron > Mark IV from Markus and Dave? This is a great > machine with many improvements. What do you think > you are going to get from the Tron Bros? Something > better? > In a message dated 3/5/2006 8:33:20 AM Pacific > Standard Time, tronbros@... writes: > In a message dated 05/03/2006 15:29:15 GMT > Standard Time, djacques@... writes: > What do you think you are going to get from > the Tron Bros? Something better? > Maybe! > Without taking sides, I think there's a major > point that's being missed here, and that is looking > at bigger picture as one of having competition with > two entities building new trons, which generally > tends to feed of each other and initiate further > advancements and higher quality (and possibly > reduced prices in the long run), and choice for the > consumer. Not all on this list can currently afford > to buy a new tron, although of course a percentage > of them can, and that does not include those who may > perhaps want to sell their present 400's for a new > MkVI or M4000 (opening up opportunities for > prospective first-time 400 owners). > > I do understand the frustration people have > expressed over Martin's whatever-you-want-to-call-it > re: the M4000, as we've been promised new m/c's > since the first Toronto workship in 2000; BUT > apparently finally coming to fruition witnessed by > Paul Marshall's recent posting (having seen AND > played one). > > Secrecy in business after years of development and > before an unveiling IS common practice (anyone here > into cars?) Who criticizes Ford or Ferrari in the > manner some here have. While there's no love lost > between Streetly and myself, I have to side with > Martin on this, although also admitting that the > present situation could have been handled better > from both sides, but again, remember the point that > opened this posting. > > My question to Martin: Are there going to be be > formal (and objective) reviews of the new M4000 in > industry publications (i.e., Sound-On-Sound, etc), > as we saw for MA's MkVI? > > Frank Samagaio > San Diego CA > MkII #134 / M400 #908 > author, The Mellotron Book > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > a.. Visit your group "Mellotronists" on the > web. > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an > email to: > Mellotronists-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the > Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Mellotronists] RE: M-4000?
2006-03-05 by mark kasian
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.