Re: [Mellotronists] Pinch roller question....Rotational Velocity
2004-09-18 by Jerry Korb
kinchmusic@... wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Hi guys.I've been onto Martin, discussing whether I should replace > the pinch rollers on my machine. They are original and most definitely > showing signs of wear. He says he can regrind them angling the edges > so making better tape contact. However, I have the feeling that as > they have become worn, it has affected the tuning of one note with > another. Surely if you have pinch rollers that are a slightly > different diameter from each other, they will be out of tune with each > other to an extent. So I'm inclined to go for a complete new > set.Anyone else have any opinions on the science of all > this?Cheers. Andy K , EMI m400 #E4/140S > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Greetings All , > To-date, I have resurfaced,reconditioned and chamfered > pinchrollers on 10 Trons . No change in note-to-note pitch > should be expected whatsoever. > > Here's the theory behind it. The capstan diameter and its > rotational velocity is the sole determining factor for trans-keyboard > stability of pitch. > The pinchrollers are simply "idlers", following the capstan's > movement to bring tapes into motion. > In principle , if their diameters were smaller, each roller would > turn more quickly relative to capstan dia. & speed. Reverse is true > if the pinchroller were of larger diameter...it would turn slower. > But each tape regardless is moving at 7.5 IPS . > > However, if the resurfaced roller has a flat spot, that would > induce pitch variations for that particular note. The dreaded > "wobblies" is related to pinchroller rotation problems, but more > associated with wear of the shaft and nylon bushing within. > And of course, alignment squareness to overall tape path . > > For example, I cleaned/resurfaced all 70 pinchrollers in MK-I > #124. Though 40 years old, None needed replacement. > They had a "glazed" look to the rubber surface which > straightaway was removed with abrasive pad and treated > with reconditioning fluid. > > Feel free to respond with your ideas on this very good point > of Andy's. Have a wonderful weekend ....Cheers, JK