Please understand that this is not my decision. Any issue of trademarks, royalties, etc., does not involve me. I did design the Klee, but donated the design and all rights thereof to electro-music as a fund raiser for electro-music.com to cover operating and show expenses. Scott contacted me to review the panel, which I did, but to be honest, the issue of royalties never even broached my feeble brain. I just didn't anticipate that as being an issue, and feel - wish, if you will - in retrospect, I would have mentioned it to Scott. I've never made a dime, nor ever intended to make a dime, off of this design. I do think the electro-music forum is a good cause, but I have absolutely no financial stake in it, one way or the other. -----Original Message----- >From: Paul Lord <plord@...> >Sent: Apr 6, 2009 7:28 PM >To: ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Re: Klee panel E-M royalty > >One correction to the analysis from Bill > >On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:22 PM, wjhall11 <wjhall@...> wrote: >> There is a possible exception to do with the trademark of the term "KLEE" >> but trademark is a whole other can of worms and would require Mr. Stites to >> register the term, or so I understand. > >Proof of prior commercial use (that's the "trade" part) is usually >sufficient for a trademark claim. Registration provides additional >protections. It is exactly analogous to copyrights, which exist upon >creation of the work but which have much smaller teeth until >registered. > >Paul >-- >who is also going to buy one however this works out and whatever it costs... ________________________________________ PeoplePC Online A better way to Internet http://www.peoplepc.com
Message
Re: [ModularSynthPanels] Re: Klee panel E-M royalty
2009-04-07 by Scott Stites
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.