this is uncalled for. The designer made royalties from "limited run" pcb sales. Parts kits were sold separately by a different end user with no mention of royalties. there is no trademark on the KLEE name also unless I am missing something? Panels sales = more pcb sales right? No one else has done or requested this. Kind of bogus. The panel is my layout, and I expect no royalties. Scott Deyo is not making kits or assembled units. He is only selling metalwork. IMHO leave the names Klee and e-m off and just put "sequencer" on the panel. You go and try to give someone props by buying and building a nice unit with the named of the designer, website and this is what happens? I hope there has been some misunderstanding. I know times are tough but this is nutso. Has anyone else been asked for royalties before like this? It's kind of like synth_diy*** with the *** meaning see the small print for the extra fees. Where does the royalty request come from directly? Man, I hope this all gets worked out somehow... Scott Deyo wrote: > Hi all, > I've been told that since the Klee is property of E-M, I am supposed to > add 20% royalty on panel sales. It's tricky for me to bring this up, > but obviously I have to. > I need to know if everyone who committed, is still committed to the > panels @ ~$120 instead of ~$100. > General discussion of the royalty is OK, too, but... Probably everyone > will be more than happy to support E-M, but I just had to say "No > flaming please!!!" > : ) > Cheers, > Scott Deyo > The Bridechamber > contact@bridechambe r.com > http://www.bridecha mber.com > Jealous Edison Record Kompany > http://www.jealouse dison.com >
Message
RE: [ModularSynthPanels] Klee panel E-M royalty
2009-04-07 by thomas white
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.