The hard constraint so far as the row of switches is concerned is only that the BYPASS switch is 1/2in from the edge of the panel because it's a 4PDT switch and needs the space. BTW, let's all remember that it only comes as a regular "bat" toggle rather than the flattened ones that are MOTM standard. Will was considering disassembling a MOTM standard SPDP switch to see if we could transplant the toggle (assuming matching blood-types). At any rate - the point is that wherever that bypass switch is placed (it makes sense to be either the left or right extreme), it needs about 1/2 in on either side of its center. Other than that there's plenty of room for another switch like the On-Off-On (M201302) switch Scott's mentioning. OK - well - there's another possibility re the bypass switch - use two DPDT 201202 switches - one for left, one for right. I'm starting to like that idea better. But anyway - Scott - could the 1V/oct tweak function be handled by a panel-mount trim pot a-la the Living VCO? (Trimmer (assumes 100K): Mouser# 594-43P104 and Panel-mount: Mouser# 594-611) That would save space on the panel, too. If BYPASS is implemented with two switches, LFO MODE with an on-off-on, and a BPOL switch added, I think we could still fit it all nicely if we use a panel mount trimmer for 1V/oct rather than a pot-and-knob. Just thinking. Bill --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Scott Juskiw <scott@...> wrote: > > I don't have the PCBs yet but I'm already working out some of the > details for this module. Bill and Will already have a panel proposed > for this (search for "flanger" on this page): > > http://www.dragonflyalley.com/billAndWillMOTMSynth.htm > > which I like, but there are some options to consider. > > 1. You don't need a rotary switch for LFO MODE. You can use one of > those 3 position centre-off switches. This frees up pot space for a 1V/ > Oct tweak pot (this is shown as an option in the schematics). JH has > mentioned (on an electro-music forum) that the 1V/Oct tracking is not > so good, so having a front panel pot may be a good idea. > 2. Can add a jack for LFO OUT (will likely need to add a buffer as > well). This would be post-LFO MODE switch, so the output will be > either ramp, slewed square, or S&H depending on LFO MODE setting. > 3. There is a BPOL (bounce polarity) switch on the schematic. Hmmm, > first one who builds one of these will have to let us know if it's > worth implementing or not. > > I'm still trying to figure out how best to hook up the LED. Should it > indicate the LFO (i.e. post-LFO MODE switch) or the total delay time? > This doesn't change the panel layout. I'll need to try out different > things after I get the boards in. >
Message
Re: SOST Flanger panel discussion
2009-10-02 by wjhall11
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.