Modular Synth Panels

> You could turn the panel over and label them whatever you like.

For this I don't need a silkscreened panel.

> You can use a 3U blank and drill and label them completely at your 
> whim.

Yeah, for this I don't need any of your frontpanels/kits anyway. ;-)

> You could use this ring mod and get rid of another one and save 
> yourself some panel space.

No, because the Warp633 has way more features and needs a full front 
panel.

>  Again, you borrow one input from another wavefolder's jack.

It is still not labelled for the ring mod and completely somewhere else.

> You can only fold a wave so much anyways, so I doubt you'd use all 
> four at once.

That is not the matter. At one time I may need the one input and at 
another time
maybe the other.
I will not resolder the jacks each time I need them. ;-)

> If none of those options work for you, then... you don't want to buy 
> my panel!    :)

Maybe other people are thinking the same as I do:
The ring mod makes no sense there.

> You can design one using Schaeffer's software and they will make it 
> for you.

If I didn't know this I wouldn't be a member of this mailing group. ;-)
I already started a design in 2 TE .com format. But I would prefer your 
design
without the two ring mod jacks.

> You can use a Stooge bracket, yes.
> Mine you can use without having to drill holes; it does indeed attach 
> to two pots.

That is really good because I have buyed many Ken Stone PCBs. :-D

Cheers,
Joachim

>
> Scott Deyo
> The Bridechamber
> contact@...
> www.bridechamber.com
> On Aug 24, 2006, at 4:22 PM, Joachim wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>  > AD633, yes. The LWF input is connected as the "modulator". Also, 
>> "LWF
>>  > Fold" _is_ the input control, as the folder reacts to the level of 
>> the
>>  > input; thus 'level' and 'fold' happen at the same time.
>>
>>  Thanks for the information, that wasn't clear to me and my PCB is 
>> still
>>  unpopulated.
>>
>>  > The nice thing about the panel is that you can use whatever ring 
>> mod
>>  > you like
>>
>>  Yeah, but I still miss a second input.
>>
>>  And I for myself have enough ring modulators elsewhere so I don't 
>> want
>>  one
>>  in my Wave Multiplier module.
>>
>>  Leaving the jacks unpopulated looks ugly. :-(
>>
>>  In the meantime I have some more questions:
>>
>>  - Can I use Stooge PCB-brackets on the frontplate?
>>
>>  If not:
>>
>>  How does your PCB-bracket work?
>>  It looks like it is connected to two pots.
>>
>>  And: Can I mount the Ken Stone PCBs without having to drill further
>>  holes
>>  (which I have to on the Stooge brackets)?
>>
>>  Thanks in advance,
>>  Joachim
>>
>>  Am 24.08.2006 um 01:44 schrieb Scott Deyo:
>>
>>  > Hello,
>>  >
>>  > They are not RoHS compatible, no. Some parts are still unavailable 
>> as
>>  > such (at least that I can find), and the PCBs are not anyways, 
>> so...
>>  > The panels are RoHS, though. No chrome treatment involved.
>>  >
>>  > AD633, yes. The LWF input is connected as the "modulator". Also, 
>> "LWF
>>  > Fold" _is_ the input control, as the folder reacts to the level of 
>> the
>>  > input; thus 'level' and 'fold' happen at the same time.
>>  >
>>  > The nice thing about the panel is that you can use whatever ring 
>> mod
>>  > you like -- I took care not to specify. I use the 633 for ease of 
>> use,
>>  > and that it fits in the proto area on the PCB. You can throw in
>>  > whatever you like -- Ken's passive ring mod (use the proto area on 
>> the
>>  > wavefolder PCB for output amplifying, or for carrier zeroing), an
>>  > MS-20 style digital ring mod, a 1496 ring mod, a Green Ringer 
>> clone, a
>>  > tube-based ring mod... ;)
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Scott Deyo
>>  > The Bridechamber
>>  > contact@...
>>  > www.bridechamber.com
>>  > On Aug 23, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Joachim wrote:
>>  >
>>  >> Hi,
>>  >>
>>  >> are the PCBs and the kits RoHS compatible?
>>  >>
>>  >> And for the frontplate for the Ken Stone Wave Multiplier:
>>  >> http://www.bridechamber.com/wavemult_big.html
>>  >>
>>  >> The web site says:
>>  >> "An AD33 ring mod has been added for extra fun."
>>  >>
>>  >> I think with AD33 you meant AD633. ;-)
>>  >>
>>  >> And I think this is not a very useful "extra fun" because
>>  >> a ring modulator needs X and Y ins.
>>  >>
>>  >> I would find it more useful to remove these two drills
>>  >> and instead move the Grinder drills one step lower
>>  >> so that an additional pot for the "LWF in" can be put there.
>>  >>
>>  >> Just my 2 cents.
>>  >>
>>  >> But I already have a PCB for the Papareil Warp633,
>>  >> so I don't need an additional AD633 ring modulator.
>>  >>
>>  >> The picture shows the panel in .com format, right?
>>  >>
>>  >> Thanks,
>>  >> Joachim
>>  >>
>>  >> Am 19.08.2006 um 20:49 schrieb Scott Deyo:
>>  >>
>>  >> > hey all,
>>  >> >
>>  >> > www.bridechamber.com is up. there are a couple layout issues on 
>> the
>>  >> > right frame of the
>>  >> > module pages -- the 'add to cart' or release dates are at the
>>  >> bottom.
>>  >> > whoops! but you get
>>  >> > the idea. :)
>>  >> >
>>  >> > thanks,
>>  >> > scott
>>  >> >
>>  >> >
>>  >> >
>>  >> >
>>  >> >
>>  >> >
>>  >> >
>>  >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>>  >> >
>>  >> >
>>  >> >
>>  >> >
>>  >> >
>>  >> >
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  
>>