Yahoo Groups archive
Thread
2009-05-29 by krelnarb
Hello Scott, I thought I'd ask this here in case any one was building one of these; do any of the Bridechamber pots conform to the .2" spacing for the 4 PCB mounted pots? The BOM calls for Spectrol 149 for those locations. Thank you, Peter
2009-05-29 by Jeff Laity
I used Scott's 249 pots on mine and they fit great. (I forgot to order the 4-pot bracket, though.) On May 29, 2009, at 12:31 PM, krelnarb wrote: > > > Hello Scott, > > I thought I'd ask this here in case any one was building one of > these; do any of the Bridechamber pots conform to the .2" spacing > for the 4 PCB mounted pots? The BOM calls for Spectrol 149 for those > locations. > > Thank you, > Peter > NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail\ufffdmay be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer\ufffdsolely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in\ufffdaccordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity. \ufffd \ufffd \ufffd
2009-05-29 by krelnarb
Great. Are the 249s the custom ones at the top of the Pots page? Thanks. Peter --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Laity <synthetic@...> wrote:
> > I used Scott's 249 pots on mine and they fit great. (I forgot to order > the 4-pot bracket, though.) > > On May 29, 2009, at 12:31 PM, krelnarb wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Scott, > > > > I thought I'd ask this here in case any one was building one of > > these; do any of the Bridechamber pots conform to the .2" spacing > > for the 4 PCB mounted pots? The BOM calls for Spectrol 149 for those > > locations. > > > > Thank you, > > Peter > > > > > NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail may be viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and his/her employer solely for the express purpose for which it has been disclosed and only in accordance with any confidentiality or non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other person or entity. > > > > > > >
2009-06-02 by Scott Deyo
No, those are Alphas. I don't have the Spectrols on the site, but can sell them for $10 per, which is just about what they are at Mouser for quantities of 25. I think I only have 50K and 100K linear. Cheers, Scott Deyo The Bridechamber contact@... http://www.bridechamber.com Jealous Edison Record Kompany http://www.jealousedison.com
On May 29, 2009, at 3:37 PM, krelnarb wrote: > > > Great. Are the 249s the custom ones at the top of the Pots page? > > Thanks. > Peter > > --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Laity <synthetic@...> > wrote: > > > > I used Scott's 249 pots on mine and they fit great. (I forgot to > order > > the 4-pot bracket, though.) > > > > On May 29, 2009, at 12:31 PM, krelnarb wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Scott, > > > > > > I thought I'd ask this here in case any one was building one of > > > these; do any of the Bridechamber pots conform to the .2" spacing > > > for the 4 PCB mounted pots? The BOM calls for Spectrol 149 for > those > > > locations. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > NOTICE: This electronic mail message and its contents, including > any attachments hereto (collectively, "this e-mail"), is hereby > designated as "confidential and proprietary." This e-mail may be > viewed and used only by the person to whom it has been sent and > his/her employer solely for the express purpose for which it has been > disclosed and only in accordance with any confidentiality or > non-disclosure (or similar) agreement between TEAC Corporation or its > affiliates and said employer, and may not be disclosed to any other > person or entity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >