So in effect, to offer lin/log response on board, you'd have had to double-up on the chip count for thos 2 cells? And have some wasted capacity too. Seems reasonable, thanks! On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:13 AM, (i think you can figure that out) <peter@buzzclick-music.com> wrote: > A comment came up about the functionality of the Model 33 Tri/VCA. > Why I kept the two of them at log only and the bottom unit the only > one with a linear option. > > The M33 uses the Analog Devices SSM2167 quad precision VCA chip as > it's engine. This is one of the last surviving products from AD's > acquisition of SSM and thank God the pro mixing industry embraced the > part because it would be gone as well had they not been used in many > high-end mixing desks over the last decade. The decision to go with > the 2164 is a wise one as it assures better than .02% harmonic distorion and a 120 dB dynamic range. However, the basic nature of these devices is non-linear. To change that I incorporated Mike Irwin's EDN published > 2164 linearization circuit and Phil Gallo's later addition to this, also > widely recognized that incorporates the circuitry for offset-free (read > seamless) lin/log switching. Both of these however require two > segments of the 2167 to do their job - two of the four. Knowing that > half of the chip is taken by this single VCA, it leaves two others > with Log response. >
Message
Re: [PLAN_B_analog_blog] Model 33 comment addressed
2008-04-23 by Norman Fay
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.