PLAN B analog blog

Dan, I ordered THREE from noisebug! I gave back two (the two worst
ones, kept the better 3rd one) with restocking fee. If you're telling
me that I should have gotten a full refund because they were
defective... I'm not going to be happy to find out the modules were
defective. Dan, can you please really make sure that your MX224s are
as good as Model 31 in terms of keeping an accurate signal? I don't
think it's possible that three in a row could be defective.

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Dan Levey <Leftbrain@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> I have a number of MX-224's around my modular and they are fine for
> 1/v Oct. He must have gotten a defective one or had an incorrect
> patch setup. The Model 31 managed to take over the role of 4 MX-
> 224's and sticks just as well to equal voltage distribution.
>
> Dan
> http://www.REwireMusic.com
>
> --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "mirror_saw7778"
> <haven1@...> wrote:
>>
>> Elan,
>>
>> could you elaborate on why the MX224 was "not good" for 1V/oct? did
> it
>> alter the signal? if so did you perhaps measure it?
>>
>> I am interested in the MX224, one of the uses would be for 1V/oct,
> but
>> mostly as an inverter for envelopes and feedback.
>>
>> thanks,
>> -Haven
>>
>>
>> --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "argitoth" <argitoth@>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey Peter, I just purchased MX224 buffered mixer/multi and I am
>> > returning them back to Noisebug because they aren't good for
> routing
>> > 1v/oct signals. I am going to replace them with Model 31. Can I
> use
>> > the Model 31 to multiply 1v/oct signals without significant pitch
>> > tracking issues?
>> >
>> > By the way, did you release any information on the Model 32 and
> 33?
>> > (What kind of modules are they?)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > -Elan
>> >
>>
>
> 



-- 
www.elanhickler.com