This would give you all the convenience of your current design while also allowing you to use each sub-module separately, for example: cv 1,2,3 into Mixer 1 audio 1,2,3 into Mixer 2 cv 4, 5 (or audio 4,5) into Xfade A,B or perhaps: cv 1,2,3 into Mixer 1 Mixer 1 normalled to Xfade A input cv 2 to Xfade B input cv 4,5,Xfade out into Mixer 2 or even: cv 1,2,3 into Mixer 1 cv 4,5,6 into Mixer 2 Mixer 1 Max out to Xfade A input Mixer 2 Min out to Xfade B input You see what I mean? :-) --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" <peter@b...> wrote: > > Thinking a little more about this i have a question: > > What's the difference between the switchable second input of the > xfader and just using one of the processor inputs? anything that > goes into the secondary input could go into one of the processor > inputs are well - so this switched in/ non normalized xfader input > would just limit three input per side (via the processor) to only 1 > input per side (via the secondary input). > > Am i missing the boat on this? let me know and thnaks, > > - P >
Message
Re: Regarding A/B inputs...
2006-01-12 by paradigmshiftbeats
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.