Yahoo Groups archive

PLAN B analog blog

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:10 UTC

Message

Re: Regarding A/B inputs...

2006-01-12 by paradigmshiftbeats

This would give you all the convenience of your current design while 
also allowing you to use each sub-module separately, for example:

cv 1,2,3 into Mixer 1
audio 1,2,3 into Mixer 2
cv 4, 5 (or audio 4,5) into Xfade A,B

or perhaps:

cv 1,2,3 into Mixer 1
Mixer 1 normalled to Xfade A input
cv 2 to Xfade B input
cv 4,5,Xfade out into Mixer 2

or even:

cv 1,2,3 into Mixer 1
cv 4,5,6 into Mixer 2
Mixer 1 Max out to Xfade A input
Mixer 2 Min out to Xfade B input

You see what I mean?  :-)


--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure 
that out)" <peter@b...> wrote:
>
> Thinking a little more about this i have a question:
> 
> What's the difference between the switchable second input of the 
> xfader and just using one of the processor inputs?  anything that 
> goes into the secondary input could go into one of the processor 
> inputs are well - so this switched in/ non normalized xfader input 
> would just limit three input per side (via the processor) to only 
1 
> input per side (via the secondary input).
> 
> Am i missing the boat on this?  let me know and thnaks,
> 
> - P
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.