hello peter, hmm i really don't know. actually i use linear vca's like the a132 or blacet dual vca for panning of control voltages and that seems to work fine. these can process both audio and cv without problems. can you please explain the difference between your panning vca and devices like a132 and the blacet dual vca? sorry if this is a dumb question ;-) best wishes ingo --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" <peter@b...> wrote: > > Well, it could, but there is a problem with this idea one must > consider: > > In order to pan audio, to avoid clicks and dead spots one needs > the transistion to be gradual, even if ever-so-slightly. This is fine > for an audio signal. For a control voltge however, this > dramatically changes the control voltage being panned, much > like the effect when one gates a DC thorugh a lowpass gate - the > vactrol makes for a really nice ring of the audio due to the fact > those devices close down slowly - with a CV however you get the > very same effect as running the CV through a slew. > > Any thoughts on this? > > - P > > > > > --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" > <synaptic_music@y...> wrote: > > > > > > hello peter, > > > > i'd love that vc quad panner too, but it should be > > able to handle dc voltages and not only audio. > > > > best wishes > > > > ingo > > > > p.s. nice idea to start a dedicated plan b group :-) > > > > > > > > --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you > can figure > > that out)" <peter@b...> wrote: > > > > > > VC Quad panner as a stand alone sounds like a great idea, > > > actually. Let me give that some serious thought. Again, if > > > enough people say 'yeah', it's a win win for everybody. > > > > > > Thanks for this (good) idea. > > > > > > - P > > > > > > --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, Robert > > > Hoffman <robmix@e...> wrote: > > > > Maybe there's two separate modules, the Balanced Stereo > > > Output, which > > > > I'm all for - sign me up, and a VC Quad panner. > > > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, October 4, 2004, at 01:17 PM, Johan Boberg > wrote: > > > > > > > > > About the proposed Balanced Stereo Output Processor, > > > > > it looks really useful, i would really like to have one. > > > > > > > > > > But i would really love to have it somehow patchable as a > > > > > Quad Output Processor if possible. It could still be used > > > > > as a stereo out if this is preferred. I don't know exactly > > > > > what it would take to convert your design into this without > > > > > changing it too much though... > > > > > > > > > > /Johan > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > ~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > Johan Boberg > > > http://www.eam.se > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <image.tiff> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <image.tiff> > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > To visit your group on the web, go to: > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PLAN_B_analog_blog/ > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > > > PLAN_B_analog_blog-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! > > Terms > > > of Service. > > > > >
Message
Re: [PLAN_B_analog_blog]
2004-10-06 by selfoscillate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.