PLAN B analog blog

On this Namm-eve I give you the first audio sample of the proposed
Plan B Wave Splicer:

http://www.ear-group.net/splicesamp.mp3

The patch is not complex.  A single Model 15's saw is being fed into
the Waveshaper of a Model 26.  That output is fed into INPUT A of the
Splicer.  Into the Splicer's iNPUT B is the Square out of the same
Model 15.  A single Model 10 is being self-cycled and is pacing a
sequencer which is controlling the Model 15's pitch. The Envelope
output of that Model 10 is sweeping the VC Splice Input of the Wave
Splicer.

There is no PWM going on, the timbral sweeps are being caused by the
edit point of the Splicer being VC's by the Model 10.

See you at Namm.

I'll take two.

--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure
that out)" <peter@...> wrote:

>
> On this Namm-eve I give you the first audio sample of the proposed
> Plan B Wave Splicer:
> 
> http://www.ear-group.net/splicesamp.mp3
> 
> The patch is not complex.  A single Model 15's saw is being fed into
> the Waveshaper of a Model 26.  That output is fed into INPUT A of the
> Splicer.  Into the Splicer's iNPUT B is the Square out of the same
> Model 15.  A single Model 10 is being self-cycled and is pacing a
> sequencer which is controlling the Model 15's pitch. The Envelope
> output of that Model 10 is sweeping the VC Splice Input of the Wave
> Splicer.
> 
> There is no PWM going on, the timbral sweeps are being caused by the
> edit point of the Splicer being VC's by the Model 10.
> 
> See you at Namm.
>

Hi Peter, 

Some nice rich timbres coming out of the splicer there. If this is 
one of the small modules we've heard about, seems like a worthy 
addition for not much rack space. I'd be interested in hearing the 
splicer "morph" between other audio sources. I'm sure such examples 
will follow soon when you have time!

Regards, 
Adam  

--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure 
that out)" <peter@...> wrote:
>
> On this Namm-eve I give you the first audio sample of the proposed
> Plan B Wave Splicer:
> 
> http://www.ear-group.net/splicesamp.mp3
> 
> The patch is not complex.  A single Model 15's saw is being fed 
into
> the Waveshaper of a Model 26.  That output is fed into INPUT A of 
the
> Splicer.  Into the Splicer's iNPUT B is the Square out of the same
> Model 15.  A single Model 10 is being self-cycled and is pacing a
> sequencer which is controlling the Model 15's pitch. The Envelope
> output of that Model 10 is sweeping the VC Splice Input of the Wave
> Splicer.
> 
> There is no PWM going on, the timbral sweeps are being caused by 
the

> edit point of the Splicer being VC's by the Model 10.
> 
> See you at Namm.
>

WOW! 
The tritone of analogue syhthesis \m/
:P

--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" 
<peter@...> wrote:

>
> On this Namm-eve I give you the first audio sample of the proposed
> Plan B Wave Splicer:
> 
> http://www.ear-group.net/splicesamp.mp3
> 
> The patch is not complex.  A single Model 15's saw is being fed into
> the Waveshaper of a Model 26.  That output is fed into INPUT A of the
> Splicer.  Into the Splicer's iNPUT B is the Square out of the same
> Model 15.  A single Model 10 is being self-cycled and is pacing a
> sequencer which is controlling the Model 15's pitch. The Envelope
> output of that Model 10 is sweeping the VC Splice Input of the Wave
> Splicer.
> 
> There is no PWM going on, the timbral sweeps are being caused by the
> edit point of the Splicer being VC's by the Model 10.
> 
> See you at Namm.
>

SLAYERRRR!!!! :P

Yes indeed Sylvain is right, tiny modules are pretty nice for us who 
are getting discouraged by the physical limitation and cost of 
eurorack cases...
Yes Peter, that's a nice initiative...

So now about that anouncement you've talked about on the NAMM video 
on Matrix synth... mmmm???


;)

g.

--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "Sylvain Delisle" 
<sdelisle@...> wrote:
>
> Diabolus in musica!  An interesting way to put it.  I like the 
ieda of
> versatiles and usefull modules built with small HP factors.  Ok, 
all modules
> can't be built this way, but it's usefull to have some.  In a 
totaly
> different way, the Doepfer A132 Dual VCA is pretty much one of the 
greatest
> incarnation of this concept.  Highly usefull and as small as you 
can make
> it.
> 
> So thanks to Peter for keeping the 4HP format alive!
> 
>   -----Message d'origine-----
>   De : PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com]De la part de gabu_004
>   Envoyé : Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:59 AM
>   À : PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com
>   Objet : [PLAN_B_analog_blog] Re: Plan B Wave Splicer - First 
Listen
> 
> 
>   WOW!
>   The tritone of analogue syhthesis \m/
>   :P
> 
>   --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can 
figure that
> out)"
>   <peter@> wrote:
>   >
>   > On this Namm-eve I give you the first audio sample of the 
proposed
>   > Plan B Wave Splicer:
>   >
>   > http://www.ear-group.net/splicesamp.mp3
>   >
>   > The patch is not complex. A single Model 15's saw is being fed 
into
>   > the Waveshaper of a Model 26. That output is fed into INPUT A 
of the
>   > Splicer. Into the Splicer's iNPUT B is the Square out of the 
same
>   > Model 15. A single Model 10 is being self-cycled and is pacing 
a
>   > sequencer which is controlling the Model 15's pitch. The 
Envelope
>   > output of that Model 10 is sweeping the VC Splice Input of the 
Wave
>   > Splicer.
>   >
>   > There is no PWM going on, the timbral sweeps are being caused 
by the
>   > edit point of the Splicer being VC's by the Model 10.
>   >
>   > See you at Namm.
>   >
> 
> 
> 
>   
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.6/1230 - Release Date: 
1/17/2008
> 4:59 PM
>

Come on Peter we are dying to know :-)
>
>