Big entertainment
2008-02-02 by Herman Pearl
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:10 UTC
Thread
2008-02-02 by Herman Pearl
I just wanted to say thank you Peter for spanking that little schmuck on the Analogue Haven forum. That was very funny!
2008-02-04 by gabu_004
ooohhh... \cassé!!/ (for those who don't understand and could get offended by a french word, like some guy on the Doepfer forum; wikipedia: Brice de Nice...VOILÀ!) I totally feel ya Herman, things could have been more "nicely exposed" to avoid it to become as low as politicians are... but guys, we shouldn't be so heavy on hexfix93, he,s contributed a lot to the synth community through his website...and making damn good music too ! my nickel (thje way we call 5 cents in Canada)! g. --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "Herman Pearl" <djsoysos@...> wrote:
> > I just wanted to say thank you Peter for spanking that > little schmuck on the Analogue Haven forum. That was > very funny! >
2008-02-04 by Herman Pearl
I'm sorry, maybe that was mean spirited of me.
2008-02-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
My opinion (doesn't make it right, just makes it mine): What Hex said was fine. He was frustrated because he had problems with his Model 15's tracking, which he called 'intonation'. Basically he would set it up, cal it and then it would go out a few minutes later. In order for me to comment on this I'd have to see the VCO to determine what the problem was. I never received the unit back, so I can't verify or discredit his results. More on M15 tracking in a second. In reply to his initial comment, Dan Levey (ReWire) went ahead and did our cal procedure on his M15 and then recorded a sound file which plays six octaves. To that, Hex put it through a tuner and found variances, the worst of which was 4 cents off dead on, with most only 1 cent off. One actually was spot on. To his results, I was elated. This type of resolution is really good for an analog VCO. Hex however made a comparison to a out of tune singer. This really isn't fair, at best a gross exaggeration given that most people can't hear something out of tune until it's in the 20 cent range. 5 cents is about the peak of human ability, and this is considered the best of the best of those with perfect pitch. His second comparison to an MFB VCO was also a bit unfair in that it's digital. OK fine no harm done, no fowl, right? The bottom line is my VCO will not nail tracking perfectly...but none will. Some will do better than others (read: ours) and there are reasons for this, most of which have to do with the incorporation of a Moog's octave switch which limits the range of the VCO to within what's called the 'linear region' but is able to offset that to higher or lower registers. In this way, the circuit is responsible for tracking a much smaller distance, but it can move that gap higher and lower over the audio band. If you want a VCO which demands keyboard tracking, this is the type you should stick to because this is the only config which will give you large-range keyboard tracking. So why didn't I do that? The Expo converter circuit used in the M15 is about 80-90% responsible for it's sound - it's reaction to audio bandwidth FM. It's a discrete driver - no op amps in the expo circuit whatsoever. Sounds great, but tracking is tougher than using other methods. 6.5 to 7 octaves, no problem. 10? It'll never happen. Maybe for a day. Most VCO's drive their expo with either an op amp or an transconductance amp such as the 13700. I can do this and tracking improves - but the instrument loses it's sound and I am not willing to make that trade off. Unfortunately, even when matching the discrete semi's in the expo drive circuit (not the expo itself, that's always been very tightly matched via a Linear Systems matched transistor pair) - it's hard to center into what's called the 'linear zone' of the expo converter's response. That's what gives you the steller tracking. If your type music requires a large tracking range - you may want to look into one of the other Eurorack VCOs on the market. There are many Excellent ones to choose from. Actually, the Aries VCO is about the best in the world for tracking if you can find one. If you want the Buchla 200 sound, then either pay $2k for a 258, or get a Model 15 which tracks a lot better than the 258 ever did. That's what the M15 was designed to do. OK, that's why. Over the course of this company's existence, I'm proud to say that I do look into people's comments and I have made changes to circuits in reply. The M15's sync, the soon-to-be M10's retriggering capability to name a few. So I tell you what...let me look into this one. If there's a way to improve the tracking without sacrificing the audio qualities and without changing the design of the expo converter circuit as it is I'll gladly do that. It may be as simple as replacing the zener diode in the expo circuit with a 6.9 volt voltage reference and making a few resistor value changes to compensate for that delta (7.5 volts to 6.9). Added to the list and I'll update you all as I've had an op to test it. In the meanwhile, I hope this helps to clear things up. The M15 is a great VCO...for what it does. Like anything else, it's a crap VCO for things it can't do. It is however what it is...! - P P.S. Matrix: please don't post, thanks!
2008-02-04 by gabu_004
I agree totally with that Peter! 5 cents is practically inaudible without another reference pitch and that would give more like a long phase shift/ beat effect than the "out of tune" standard of western music... And to come tyo singers... What makes a choir beautiful is that they're all a few cents off from each others, givin the warm timbre of it all...without forgetting all distinct timbre of each choir,s members! But whatever, no worries Peter, I'm fully satisfied with M15 and waiting for another one in the mail right now! Oh yeah, the toll free no. on your website doesn't work from here in Montréal, are the numbers that accompanies your name on Analoguehaven forum are some alternative(or at least one of them)? thanks:) g. Now I'm waiting for my second one --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" <peter@...> wrote:
> > My opinion (doesn't make it right, just makes it mine): > > What Hex said was fine. He was frustrated because he had problems > with his Model 15's tracking, which he called 'intonation'. Basically > he would set it up, cal it and then it would go out a few minutes > later. In order for me to comment on this I'd have to see the VCO to > determine what the problem was. I never received the unit back, so I > can't verify or discredit his results. > > More on M15 tracking in a second. > > In reply to his initial comment, Dan Levey (ReWire) went ahead and did > our cal procedure on his M15 and then recorded a sound file which > plays six octaves. To that, Hex put it through a tuner and found > variances, the worst of which was 4 cents off dead on, with most only > 1 cent off. One actually was spot on. > > To his results, I was elated. This type of resolution is really good > for an analog VCO. Hex however made a comparison to a out of tune > singer. This really isn't fair, at best a gross exaggeration given > that most people can't hear something out of tune until it's in the 20 > cent range. 5 cents is about the peak of human ability, and this is > considered the best of the best of those with perfect pitch. > > His second comparison to an MFB VCO was also a bit unfair in that it's > digital. > > OK fine no harm done, no fowl, right? The bottom line is my VCO will > not nail tracking perfectly...but none will. Some will do better than > others (read: ours) and there are reasons for this, most of which have > to do with the incorporation of a Moog's octave switch which limits > the range of the VCO to within what's called the 'linear region' but > is able to offset that to higher or lower registers. In this way, the > circuit is responsible for tracking a much smaller distance, but it > can move that gap higher and lower over the audio band. If you want a > VCO which demands keyboard tracking, this is the type you should stick > to because this is the only config which will give you large-range > keyboard tracking. > > So why didn't I do that? > > The Expo converter circuit used in the M15 is about 80-90% responsible > for it's sound - it's reaction to audio bandwidth FM. It's a discrete > driver - no op amps in the expo circuit whatsoever. Sounds great, but > tracking is tougher than using other methods. 6.5 to 7 octaves, no > problem. 10? It'll never happen. Maybe for a day. Most VCO's drive > their expo with either an op amp or an transconductance amp such as > the 13700. I can do this and tracking improves - but the instrument > loses it's sound and I am not willing to make that trade off. > Unfortunately, even when matching the discrete semi's in the expo > drive circuit (not the expo itself, that's always been very tightly > matched via a Linear Systems matched transistor pair) - it's hard to > center into what's called the 'linear zone' of the expo converter's > response. That's what gives you the steller tracking. > > If your type music requires a large tracking range - you may want to > look into one of the other Eurorack VCOs on the market. There are many > Excellent ones to choose from. Actually, the Aries VCO is about the > best in the world for tracking if you can find one. If you want the > Buchla 200 sound, then either pay $2k for a 258, or get a Model 15 > which tracks a lot better than the 258 ever did. That's what the M15 > was designed to do. > > OK, that's why. > > Over the course of this company's existence, I'm proud to say that I > do look into people's comments and I have made changes to circuits in > reply. The M15's sync, the soon-to-be M10's retriggering capability > to name a few. So I tell you what...let me look into this one. If > there's a way to improve the tracking without sacrificing the audio > qualities and without changing the design of the expo converter > circuit as it is I'll gladly do that. It may be as simple as > replacing the zener diode in the expo circuit with a 6.9 volt voltage > reference and making a few resistor value changes to compensate for > that delta (7.5 volts to 6.9). > > Added to the list and I'll update you all as I've had an op to test > it. In the meanwhile, I hope this helps to clear things up. The M15 is > a great VCO...for what it does. Like anything else, it's a crap VCO > for things it can't do. It is however what it is...! > > - P > > P.S. Matrix: please don't post, thanks! >
2008-02-04 by Anthony Rolando
This is really well put Peter. Most people do not understand the difference between the Model 15 and the Moog Style Oscillator utilizing the Octave Switch. You may consider including some of this explanation on the site somewhere (perhaps you have, and I just have not seen it). Across several octaves, 4 cent pitch tracking variances are very acceptable as analog VCOs are concerned. 1 cent variances should just be considered DEAD ON. Tony > To: PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com > From: peter@buzzclick-music.com > Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:48:12 +0000 > Subject: [PLAN_B_analog_blog] Re: Big entertainment (and commentary on the M15 tracking) > > My opinion (doesn't make it right, just makes it mine): > > What Hex said was fine. He was frustrated because he had problems > with his Model 15's tracking, which he called 'intonation'. Basically > he would set it up, cal it and then it would go out a few minutes > later. In order for me to comment on this I'd have to see the VCO to > determine what the problem was. I never received the unit back, so I > can't verify or discredit his results. > > More on M15 tracking in a second. > > In reply to his initial comment, Dan Levey (ReWire) went ahead and did > our cal procedure on his M15 and then recorded a sound file which > plays six octaves. To that, Hex put it through a tuner and found > variances, the worst of which was 4 cents off dead on, with most only > 1 cent off. One actually was spot on. > > To his results, I was elated. This type of resolution is really good > for an analog VCO. Hex however made a comparison to a out of tune > singer. This really isn't fair, at best a gross exaggeration given > that most people can't hear something out of tune until it's in the 20 > cent range. 5 cents is about the peak of human ability, and this is > considered the best of the best of those with perfect pitch. > > His second comparison to an MFB VCO was also a bit unfair in that it's > digital. > > OK fine no harm done, no fowl, right? The bottom line is my VCO will > not nail tracking perfectly...but none will. Some will do better than > others (read: ours) and there are reasons for this, most of which have > to do with the incorporation of a Moog's octave switch which limits > the range of the VCO to within what's called the 'linear region' but > is able to offset that to higher or lower registers. In this way, the > circuit is responsible for tracking a much smaller distance, but it > can move that gap higher and lower over the audio band. If you want a > VCO which demands keyboard tracking, this is the type you should stick > to because this is the only config which will give you large-range > keyboard tracking. > > So why didn't I do that? > > The Expo converter circuit used in the M15 is about 80-90% responsible > for it's sound - it's reaction to audio bandwidth FM. It's a discrete > driver - no op amps in the expo circuit whatsoever. Sounds great, but > tracking is tougher than using other methods. 6.5 to 7 octaves, no > problem. 10? It'll never happen. Maybe for a day. Most VCO's drive > their expo with either an op amp or an transconductance amp such as > the 13700. I can do this and tracking improves - but the instrument > loses it's sound and I am not willing to make that trade off. > Unfortunately, even when matching the discrete semi's in the expo > drive circuit (not the expo itself, that's always been very tightly > matched via a Linear Systems matched transistor pair) - it's hard to > center into what's called the 'linear zone' of the expo converter's > response. That's what gives you the steller tracking. > > If your type music requires a large tracking range - you may want to > look into one of the other Eurorack VCOs on the market. There are many > Excellent ones to choose from. Actually, the Aries VCO is about the > best in the world for tracking if you can find one. If you want the > Buchla 200 sound, then either pay $2k for a 258, or get a Model 15 > which tracks a lot better than the 258 ever did. That's what the M15 > was designed to do. > > OK, that's why. > > Over the course of this company's existence, I'm proud to say that I > do look into people's comments and I have made changes to circuits in > reply. The M15's sync, the soon-to-be M10's retriggering capability > to name a few. So I tell you what...let me look into this one. If > there's a way to improve the tracking without sacrificing the audio > qualities and without changing the design of the expo converter > circuit as it is I'll gladly do that. It may be as simple as > replacing the zener diode in the expo circuit with a 6.9 volt voltage > reference and making a few resistor value changes to compensate for > that delta (7.5 volts to 6.9). > > Added to the list and I'll update you all as I've had an op to test > it. In the meanwhile, I hope this helps to clear things up. The M15 is > a great VCO...for what it does. Like anything else, it's a crap VCO > for things it can't do. It is however what it is...! > > - P > > P.S. Matrix: please don't post, thanks! > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PLAN_B_analog_blog/ > > Your email settings: > Individual Email | Traditional > > To change settings online go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PLAN_B_analog_blog/join > (Yahoo! ID required) > > To change settings via email: > mailto:PLAN_B_analog_blog-digest@yahoogroups.com > mailto:PLAN_B_analog_blog-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > PLAN_B_analog_blog-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > _________________________________________________________________ Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You IM, we give. http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join