As a 259e owner, and based on what I know currently know of the M30, my
opinion is that they are nothing alike beyond they fact that they
implement "analog" features via digital methods.
I think it would be a mistake to think of the M30 as a substitute for
the 259e. The M30 is its own beast and deserves to be thought of a
something unique to Plan-B. Don't get me wrong. I love my 259e
modules and I love my M15s. And, I will place a wager stating that: If
Peter is going to put his stamp on the M30, it is going to be much more
than a substitute, it is going to be the "shizz-nite!" as Master Shake
would say.
And just for the record: the 259e is definitely the "shizz-nite" as
well.
"Just because someone wins, it doesn't mean someone has to lose."
-Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon.com paraphrasing Nash Game Theory.
--- In "Pierre Zeeman" <infrequent.listener@... wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> I wanted a 259e from the moment I first read about it (I love the
> marriage of analogue and . . . the m30 looks to be a very fine
> substitute...