Ooops!! I just looked at which group this is in and my posts are probably not appropriate. When I made them, I just assumed that it was the Epson Printers group that I am also joined to. I am really sorry if I confused anyone or led them astray. ;-( Harvey Sent from my iPad On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Harvey Fishman wrote: > I am not really sure what you mean by a _digital negative_. I print images from pictures taken with my Nikon D300 camera. They are printed as positives in color and are at least as good as similar prints made with the 2400. I never really made an extensive critical comparison as I had no reason to expect the 3800 to be at all inferior. Among the reasons for my switching was the cheaper ink, the 17 x 22 image size vs. the 13 x 19, and especially the fact that the 3800 has a built in NIC. > > Harvey > > Sent from my iPad > > On Apr 4, 2012, at 13:29, James Hajicek <jameshajicek@...> wrote: > >> Thanks Harvey. I take your answer to mean you saw no quality difference in >> terms of what the two different printers were capable of doing when making >> digital negatives. Again many thanks. >> Best, >> James >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------ >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Harvey Fishman | fishman@... | A little heresy is good for the soul. 718-258-7276 |
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Epson 2400 or 3880?
2012-04-04 by Harvey Fishman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.