For producing digital negatives or prints the 3800/3880 will certainly out perform the 2400. No question about it. --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, James Hajicek <jameshajicek@...> wrote: > > Sorry - I probably wasn't clear that I intend to use QTR to make digital > negatives to be used for printing with 19th century processes rather than > for making positive digital prints. > James > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: Epson 2400 or 3880?
2012-04-05 by Don