QTR-Quadtone RIP

Hi Paul,

I'm not sure exactly what your issue is.  Ned's I believe is due to
the scaling in 1%
increments.  Sounds like yours may be different.  I'm not sure whether
your "size"
references are "pixel sizes" or "linear sizes".

Another thing that has shown up sometimes is using JPG files.  A lot
of the programs
that save jpg's seem to leave out the "linear size" of the image.
(i.e. 1000 pixels could be
any number of inches).   Different libraries that read/write the file
then make different
resolution assumptions/defaults.   This makes the scaling a problem sometimes.

Are you using jpg's?  Did you find a setup that works consistently?
-- could be just that you used PS which I think always saves the linear size.

Roy

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Paul <paulmwhiting@...> wrote:
>
>
> Hello Roy,
>
> Perhaps you missed my post a few posts back, but I took a cue from your exchange with Ned. What I did was go back to my original file, which was substantially larger, and then reduce it within QTR. What I did earlier was to reduce the size outside QTR, in Photoshop.
>
> It worked! Is this somehow related to Ned's question?
>
> Thanks for your program!
>
> Paul
>
> --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Roy Harrington <roy@...> wrote:
>>
>> Ned, as far as I know this has always been the way it worked.  At
>> least I don't know
>> of any changes that would have done this.  Main caveat I have though
>> is that I don't
>> use Windows -- I'm on a Mac.  (Otherwise, I probably would have
>> noticed this a long
>> time ago and changed it).
>>
>> Sorry,
>> Roy
>


-- 
Roy Harrington
roy@...
www.harrington.com