I'm surprised Roy hasn't responded to this. To my understanding, the linearization in QTR assumes equally-spaced points. i.e. if you entered 5 points, it would assume 0,25,50,75,100. 11 points would be 0, 10, 20...100, etc. You could do 4% intervals, wouldn't that be a 26-point linearization? 33 or 34 linearization points would very slightly perturb the linearization curve, you could run some evaluations to determine where that perturbation would have the least effect. --Greg --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla <e.dinkla@...> wrote: > > On 06/07/2012 07:47 PM, John Labovitz wrote: > > > Given that the QTR tools don't seem to need any configuration to > > indicate the particular patches (they're just read from the CGATS file, > > as you know), I'd reckon that there's no assumption being made as to the > > specific intervals between patches. Hence, having arbitrary patches as > > you're describing will probably work. > > > > --John > > John, > > Thank you, gives me confidence enough to go that much easier route. > > > -- > Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst > > Dinkla Grafische Techniek > Quad, piëzografie, giclée > www.pigment-print.com >
Message
Re: Linearisation targets need similar steps?
2012-06-08 by gmikol
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.