Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Message

Re: How to produce an effective/accurate dot gain curve

2012-11-07 by lougray1234

Thanks for your response, Paul. That info is very handy. I managed to also find a previous thread that you wrote in, describing how to determine max black and "Black Boost" in a more empirical way.

However, I'm still a little confused. The QTR manual offers a way to compensate for dot gain, yet below, you seem to be suggesting that the dot gain curve in QTR is not a very significant quality factor. 

I am trying to understand why this is the case? Is it because the black / gray curve linearization process is a method in itself for compensating for dot gain?

Or, is it more a case that dot gain on an inkjet (using inkjet paper) is so minimal that it is an insignificant issue?

Many thanks again, and apologies for my annoying questions.


--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Paul Roark <roark.paul@...> wrote:
>
> One write-up of how I use or recommend people start with QTR starts at page
> 11 of http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Eboni-4-Plus.pdf .  I think the
> approach would apply to most inksets.
> 
> I rarely use the tabs to control the inks aside from the linearization tab.
>  Usually, the default QTR partitioning curve plus linearization is all that
> is needed.
> 
> Determining the individual ink limits and densities are the key inputs that
> you'll need to determine.  Even there, QTR seems relatively tolerant of
> variation.
> 
> I do tend to use a black ink limit that is slightly less than where the
> dmax was -- using the Black Boost for the end of the black curve.  But this
> is not necessary either.
> 
> I'd recommend you start simple.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.