Thanks for your response, Paul. That info is very handy. I managed to also find a previous thread that you wrote in, describing how to determine max black and "Black Boost" in a more empirical way. However, I'm still a little confused. The QTR manual offers a way to compensate for dot gain, yet below, you seem to be suggesting that the dot gain curve in QTR is not a very significant quality factor. I am trying to understand why this is the case? Is it because the black / gray curve linearization process is a method in itself for compensating for dot gain? Or, is it more a case that dot gain on an inkjet (using inkjet paper) is so minimal that it is an insignificant issue? Many thanks again, and apologies for my annoying questions. --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Paul Roark <roark.paul@...> wrote: > > One write-up of how I use or recommend people start with QTR starts at page > 11 of http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Eboni-4-Plus.pdf . I think the > approach would apply to most inksets. > > I rarely use the tabs to control the inks aside from the linearization tab. > Usually, the default QTR partitioning curve plus linearization is all that > is needed. > > Determining the individual ink limits and densities are the key inputs that > you'll need to determine. Even there, QTR seems relatively tolerant of > variation. > > I do tend to use a black ink limit that is slightly less than where the > dmax was -- using the Black Boost for the end of the black curve. But this > is not necessary either. > > I'd recommend you start simple. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: How to produce an effective/accurate dot gain curve
2012-11-07 by lougray1234
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.