Paul/Dave Once again, thanks for the time and input. I have now used the cool and warm curves mixed and am getting much better wedges. I've compared these to a print via the Epson driver and they are way smoother. 2880 resolution uni-directional definitely gives the best result. Comparing these to a print using the Epson driver shows the QTR prints to be much smoother, even when viewing from several feet away I can see graininess in the Epson print. Looking at the earlier Claria prints I can see the artifacts are mainly noticable in the black-only prints. I'd run off a few image prints and was getting a flatter and lighter print than the screen image. I thought I'd better start some wedges for profiling and was trying to get a good baseline print. I started with the curve at the top of the list, which was the black-only and then tried changing all other variables, one at a time, which with paper-loading issues and numerous spurious duplicate prints was starting to really frustrate. Had I started with changing the curves instead of everything else I would have been happier quicker! I am probably trying to run before the crawling and walking stages are complete. I only bought my first digital camera 8 weeks ago and am trying to be where I was with my wet printing using all analogue techniques. regards Ross
Message
Re: banding and dithering with QTR and UT14 Epson 1500 (1430)
2013-02-01 by rossfmj
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.