Hi Paul, In the PDF, you note that: `If the LM fades faster than the LC, the print will take on a green hue that most viewers find rather unpleasant. How well matched the LM and LC color pigments are in terms of their rates of fading becomes a significant issue for image stability.' Seems like a big caveat. Is it possible to quantify or mitigate the risk here? I'd probably be using Canson Baryta Photographique, so presumably a fair amount of LM and LC would be needed for a neutral print. Thanks, Mark --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Paul Roark <roark.paul@...> wrote: > > The blended color + carbon inksets have had some issues with separation in > wide format printers. Take a look at the graphs at page 4 of > http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/4K+.pdf. For that reason, I abandoned > blended inks in such printers. > > On the other hand, the HP Z3100/3200 inks do not separate significantly. > When diluted with the generic base, the cost of such inks is not bad at > all, and the lightfastness would be way more than third party blended B&W > inks. > > For my latest glossy pigment inkset approach for wide format, see > http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/4000-6K-Plus.pdf I like the separate > light colors for several reasons. I used Epson LM and LC with MIS carbon. > That gives me very economical, low-bronzing MIS carbon with the very > lightfast Epson colors. It also allows full 3D profiling with QTR. The > more economical MIS light colors could, of course, be used also. In my > view, however, so little color is actually used that on a per print basis, > the cost difference is minimal, yet the image stability difference would be > substantial. > > I liked the basic approach well enough that when I went back to dyes in > wide format I stayed with the multiple grays with high gamut light colors > for toning. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > > mkkura2002 <kura@...> wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > I'm printing with UT14 inks on Ilford Gold Fibre Silk and FA matt paper > > with very good results, but I need wider printer. Can someone recommend me > > solution - I think about Epson 7600/9600 with UT 7. > > > > Marcin Korczak > > > > _ > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: Large format UT14 alterntive ?
2013-03-26 by mccarvill
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.