Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Message

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Ink limit low limit

2015-01-28 by Stefan Christiansen

Speaking of math and "the programming that controls the firing of individual nozzles", if one printed twice the same file with the same profile, would one get the very same dots placements?
Would the QTR's dithering algorithms make the very same job or is some random calculation made here?
What I have in mind is printing twice - or more - the same media with the same file and hopefully get some random placement. I wouldn't dare the comparison with an aquatint true-random pattern, but that's the idea.


Stefan Christiansen






Le 28 janv. 2015 à 13:57, richard@... [QuadtoneRIP] <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> a écrit :


> I should have said earlier that my response about low ink limits was directed mostly to making positive prints on paper with partitioned inks.
>
>
> Sandy's approach sounds really interesting, especially for the smaller droplet size printers, and would "fill in" the spaced created by the low ink limits. I've been using the Peizography digital negative ink set for the last few years so I don't mess too much with making digital negatives with QTR anymore.
>
> I was reading about guten print and the programming that controls the firing of individual nozzles, but it is way above my head. I think it is written in C and involves too much computer math for me. I might force myself to learn it some day, but using the built is functions work great so I haven't found a reason for getting deeper into it.
>
> Richard Boutwell
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.