Just to be clear, all the evidence I see is that the data is accurate. In fact, I'm able to use the i1 21x4 patches if I use the spot measurement. I figure it's just that because most people who are interested in linearization .quad files probably have i1 devices, so the tools that Roy developed are designed for the i1.
I'm sure that PPE will make using the Munki much easier. However, I can confirm that it is feasible to use the Munki to linearize .quad files.
My Aurora Art Natural is so far from linearity (looks like one of those quadratic functions we had to plot in math class years ago) that QTR-Linearize-quad won't linearize it. I may have Inkjetmall profile it, but that would be like having someone add a supercharger to a Toyota Tercel.
Larry
--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 12/13/16, 'forums@...' forums@... [QuadtoneRIP] <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] .quad file from QTR-linearization
To: "QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com" <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com>
Received: Tuesday, December 13, 2016, 6:08 AM
ColorMunki software (color-picker) exports some
messed up data. It’s not the quality of the sensor (they
are basically the same between the two devices) but it’s a
difference in data output from the software.
PPE will be back on sale
shortly.
best,Walker
On Dec 12, 2016, at 11:24 PM, pianoquartet@yahoo.ca
[QuadtoneRIP] <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com>
wrote:
Finally got it.
QTR-linearize seems to be
optimized to read i1 data. To use Munki data I had to
borrow a .txt made by some one else's i1, then copy and
paste my L, A, and B values in place of theirs. Once this
was done, I got a .quad file just fine, and linearity is
improved greatly.
Larry
#yiv4540794682 #yiv4540794682 --Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] .quad file from QTR-linearization
2016-12-13 by Larry Beach