It would be interesting to try. But, I certainly would not pay $125 for it without proof that it is in every way as good or, as it is claimed through being much easier than QTR, better than QTR. It seems to me that if one could simply take all “the math, the ink descriptor text file stuff” from the QTR process “and threw it out the window” to achieve the same results, Roy Harrington would have done so by now. You know the old adage “if it seems too good to be true, it likely is.” That said, it may be true. But, it surely is incumbent upon the developer to prove it by providing a test version of the software. Mick From: <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of "Mark Savoia mark@stillrivereditions.com [QuadtoneRIP]" <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> Reply-To: <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 9:19 AM To: <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Using QTR and Epson k3 Inks for making digital negs on OHP Me too. Mark stillrivereditions.com On Aug 28, 2018, at 5:19 PM, daimone@... [QuadtoneRIP] <QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com> wrote: Richard, Somewhere around here a few weeks back you mentioned a demo Mac version might be out soon. Did this ever happen or will it? I'd like to give it a try...
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Using QTR and Epson k3 Inks for making digital negs on OHP
2018-08-29 by Mick Sang
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.