The way to think of it is that it's always white-to-black. So "white" in density is the smaller number but "white" in Lab values is the larger number. Roy --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Husband" <tom.husband@...> wrote: > > OK thanks. So if I'm creating a custom curve from the > IlfordSmPearl-neutral-cool curve but using a densitometer (DMAX) I should > reverse the input and put 0% in the upper left? > > Tom > > On 7/11/06, jkohn_home <jkohn_home@...> wrote: > > > > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Husband" <tom.husband@> wrote: > > > > > > I'm creating some 2400 curves for Silver Rag and am using the > > > IlfordSmPearl-neutral-cool as a starting point. I noticed that the > > > linearization values starts with the 100% value in the upper left but > > > with other papers and my old 2200 it's the opposite. Tom Moore's > > > excellent user guide also says 0% should start in the upper left. > > > Does it matter? > > > > I think you'll find that whether the biggest or smallest number is in > > the first box depends on whether the values entered are Luminosity (ie > > L* channel) or density/DMAX. When using an Eye One with > > QTR-Linearize-Data, the linearization values you get are L* instead of > > density. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: Linearization Value Order for 2400
2006-07-13 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.