milogiacomorambaldi47 wrote:
>
> If not, then I'm still confused. Otherwise, then perhaps there's hope
> for my previous workflow, which begins with Canon RAW files, then
> Adobe Camera Raw, then 16-bit ProPhotoRGB, etc. I'm hoping that
> converting to QTR-GrayLab early in the process, editing entirely in
> 16-bit, converting to 8-bit only when all is ready, then converting to
> QTR-RGB-Matte with Qimage, and finally printing with QTR... will do
> the trick. Sound plausible?
>
> Michael
If I recall it correctly Roy addressed the QTR profile
compatibility of Qimage again when QTR's profiling application
became part of QTR. However the process I found the most
reliable (over a longer period) is in converting the Greyscale
image to QTR-gray-matte profile (or another QTR based gray
profile) in Photoshop, make it 8 bit, and load the Tiff in
Qimage for further processing without color management on. It
doesn't influence the extrapolation and sharpening functions
of Qimage and keeps the file small till it drops in Qimage. In
the past I have seen some shadow issues with QTR profiles in
Qimage which probably had to do with the BPC interpretation in
Qimage. The last has been changed later on in Qimage but
Qimage is also a moving target with all its upgrades (a good
thing) that I'm not willing to test every time its CM
compatibility with QTR profiles. In theory it should work though.
One feature could tempt me to use Qimage's CM with quad prints
again and that is the profiling per image on more images per
print page. I've made some profiles for gloss varnished canvas
and matte varnished canvas. Both can then be printed on the
same canvas sheet but individually get the right profile for
the varnish type used per print.
Ernst
--
--
Ernst Dinkla
www.pigment-print.com
( unvollendet )Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: QTR/Qimage update since Jan 2005?
2006-08-11 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.