Use Qimage to scale the image from say a 300 dpi TIFF to 720 dpi which the driver expects. Set the Epson printer driver to either print at 1440 ppi or 2800 ppi and use QTRIP to process the B&W which sends it to the driver which in turn talks to the hardware that takes care of sending ink to the paper at either be 1440 ppi or 2800 ppi. I previously posted my question to the qimage yahoo group and received the following link that seems to provide most of the answers I was looking for: <http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1003&message=16814115> Enjoy, Pierre --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, joachim oppenheimer <joachim2@...> wrote: > > Thank you very much for your response to my inquiry. As I understand it, > QImage would scale the image (presumably without significant loss of > quality) to 1400 or higher dpi on an Epson that is factory-set to accept > files at 720 dpi. Do I understand you correctly? Joachim > > -----Original Message----- > From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@...m]On > Behalf Of ve2caz > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 1:49 PM > To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: QImage > > > Bear in mind that I am investigating this so I have no real experience > with any of these software but what follows is my understanding. > > Basically Canon and HP printer drivers expect images at 600 ppi > whereas Epson printer drivers expect images at 720 ppi. These drivers > will accept images at other ppi settings but then the printer drivers > are forced to scale the images back to these values. > > There are a variety of scaling algorithms out there but they do not > all produce the same quality when used. Photoshop scaling usually > involves Bicubic/Bicubic Smoother/Bicubic Sharper to name a few. If > you scale an image to say achieve a print of 8"x10"@300 ppi and send > it to the printer driver, the driver will scale it further using some > algorithm so that the results are 8"x10"@720 ppi for an Epson printer. > The result of which is two passes of scaling with less than perfect > algorithms. > > That is where Qimage comes in. If you leave your image set at 300 ppi > and at the native resolution this would normally generate an image in > 5"x7" size for example, you would just go into Qimage and ask it to > print the image at 8"x10". Qimage will take care of all those details > and produce the highest quality print. > > Now this claim is really based on having access to scaling algorithms > that are of very high quality. You could do this yourself if you have > other tools allowing you to scale images and then just print them off. > > The fact is that Qimage just makes this simple and takes care of lots > of annoying things that you would normally have to do. > > What I do not know is what happens if you scale an image using Qimage > so that it is at 720 ppi (or 600 ppi) and then feed this to QTRIP? > > I vaguely remember reading somewhere that QTRIP expects files to be at > 300 ppi so I don't know if this would defeat the purpose of high > quality scaling of images for the purpose of preventing the driver > from scaling it using some unknown algorithm. > > I hope this helps. > > Pierre > > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "mohonk1986" <joachim2@> wrote: > > > > I prepare my work in PhotoshopCS2 and print on the Epson 2200 using > > the QuadtoneRIP. I have noted and am confused by references to Qimage. > > What role, if any, should QImage play in the workflow? What are the > > purported advantages? I would appreciate explanation of that program > > as it relates to QuatoneRIP. Thank you. Joachim > > >
Message
Re: QImage
2006-08-11 by ve2caz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.