Roy (or anyone else), can anything be done to develop a profile that better handles shadows (using QTR-CreateICC or another tool)? I've just noticed the same issue on a photo of a dark suit. The suit is well defined on my calibrated monitor but is almost all black when printed using a properly defined curve and a profile made using QTR-CreateICC. I converted the file to this profile using Photoshop and perceptual intent. I can understand why jkohn_home would fall back to using gray-lab / gamma+4, but it seems to me that correcting the profile somehow, would be the best solution. (BTW, thanks for posting your test results!) Thanks, Terry. jkohn_home wrote: > > So I did one final test using gray- lab instead of the > > profile, but boosting the gamma setting in QTR to +4 in > order to darken the midtones some. > > This proved to be "just right", as the real-world image now showed > > excellent shadow detail and the midtone values were closer > to where > > they should be: > > > > http://www.pbase.com/image/66139883 > > <http://www.pbase.com/image/66139883> > > > > So in the case of my HPR curves for the 2400, it looks like > I'm going > > to be printing directly from gray-lab using gamma=+4, > unless the image > > has no shadows to be concerned with (which is rare for me). The > > resulting prints look amazing, it was definitely worth all > the work
Message
RE: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: QImage, ICC Profiles, and some surprising results (long)
2006-09-04 by Terry Ritz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.