Joost Horsten wrote: > ... > I've too little insight yet to agree or disagree. But I have trouble > understanding how just one profile could cope with differences in the > inks for the different tones. A profile is not unique to a paper but > different for each paper-ink set combination. And in the sitation at > hand one needs three different ink sets (warm, cool, selenium). My > feeling is that your proposal would only work if e.g. the cool inks > would behave exactly identical to the warm and selenium inks. And for > the UT3D inkset there even is no LK selenium ink. Joost Several greyscale inksets are designed to be compatible with each other in this sense. I believe the different positions in the various piezography sets were all of matching density as are the current K7 neutral & sepia sets. That is how inks in matching positions can be interchanged and used with the same curves. Similarly MIS FS & FSN, the UT7 carbon & cool toners and UT-R2-Warm & Neutral all include similar density inks in the equivalent positions of the warm & neutral/cool sets. In that sense the luminance should be the similar whichever way they are mixed & matched. Perhaps in this sense, one generic profile would work for each family of inks. I am not familiar with UT3d which you have been using and it sounds like this is a more complex set of inks for which the above scenario does not apply. Howard
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: QTR feature request - using 3 curves
2006-12-07 by Howard Shaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.