jr, Thanks for your detailed post. No, I am not getting banding in the initial 21-step wedges for the individual inks during calibration mode. I am getting banding on the 21step.tif file that is printed out after you take QTRgui out of calibration mode. This is the step wedge that I need to measure in order to linearize the curve. This is also not the type of banding you see with a clogged nozzle. I check my nozzles before and after each calibration print to verify that I didn't have a clog during the calibration print. The banding I'm talking about is not the fine line banding that is typical with a missing nozzle. These are gradient bands (if that description makes any sense) that seem like they would be due to improper overlap (partitioning) of the 6 inks upon printout. These gradient bands are obvious in the smooth gradient that runs across the top of the step wedge. The bands extend down into the 5% blocks and it seems would have an impact on the measuring of the 5% blocks for linearization. But I will read through your description and cross check against my process. Mike --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Randall" <jrandall@...> wrote: > > Mike: > > I assume you see the banding in the calibration print stepwedges. Do > you see banding in just one ink's wedge or in all wedges? Banding is > usually caused either by clogs, dirty underside of printhead, > airleaks, or incomplete purging of old inks associated with the > particular ink step-wedge. Banding in all wedges is often a > stepping motor/paper advance problem. > > I have found that I get better results *generally* following Tom > Moore's procedure than Paul Roark's. YMMV! [Desclaimer: The last > inkset I profiled was Paul Roark's K4+Ccm--I have no experience with > Cone inks.] If I had your first calibration print at 100%, I'd set > the K default limit to something between 50% and 80%, maybe 65 or > 75%--I'd have to see the results. Then I'd print out the second > calibration print at what ever % I decided on to make the second > calibration print and calculate the relative ink densities to K at > that % leaving the limits of the other grays blank and set Black > Boost to something like 85% or 90%. I'd also set the Gray Curves > tab values to something like 6,6,_,1. This will darken the > resulting stepwedge below that created by the default values, but as > Paul says it helps smooth the transition between the 95 and 100% > steps and it linearizes well for me. This would become my base > profile. I'd print out a 21-step wedge and use my > densitometer/colorimeter to measure the density or Lab L and plot > against the step number or % value. The result should be a smooth > curve below the straight line connecting the 0 and 100 readings (see > Paul Roark's figure). I then would adjust ink limits as needed to > get a smooth curve (for me it usually is the darkest gray I need to > tweak the most). > > Hope this helps. There are no hard and fast rules. Creating > profiles from scratch still has a strong component of art ... > > jr > > > > > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Dawson" <dawsonm@> > wrote: > > > > > > Can anyone give me some common causes of banding in the step > wedge? > > > > With the 1280/K6/Epson VFA combination I found that the ink limit > for > > the Black ink was at 80%. The density shoulder actually begins > > occuring at about 50% with a density of 1.62. It hits 1.69 at 80% > > and holds that value up until 100%. > > > > I then printed out the ink separation test using an ink limit of > > 85%. I then determined the densities (compared to Black) of all > the > > other inks from the 100% squares. > > > > I also measured all ink patches from the first ink separation > test. > > Based on advice from Paul Roarke I used the ink limits from these > > measurements to plug into the curve creation windows. I found > that > > ALL of the inks (except for Black) had no plateau and were > increasing > > in density all the way up to 100%. So I plugged in 100% ink limit > > for all the inks, except for Black which has the default of 80%. > > Black Boost was left blank. >
Message
Re: Step wedge issues during QTR curve creation
2007-02-07 by Mike Dawson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.