Tom, Thanks for your reply. I'm well aware of the different ways to convert an RGB image to grayscale mode. However, conversion to grayscale mode, at least to the best of my knowledge, causes a loss of contrast as compared to maintaining the RGB file as an RGB file and using Desaturate or Channel Mixer/Monochrome in Photoshop. So why does the QTR documentation suggest you convert to grayscale mode? QTR works just as well on RGB mode Desaturated or Channel Mixer/Monochrome images as long as you use Convert to Profile/QTR - RGB Matte Paper or /QTR - RGB Photo Paper before saving as tif. Frans Waterlander --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Moore" <rtmlists8888@...> wrote: > > Frans > > The issue of conversion from colour to B&W is a complex one that has > engendered many long debates and discussions. A companion list to this > one, DigitalBlackandWhitethePrint has had several useful discussions > on this point. Also, there are many tool for B&W conversion providing > many options for contrast and conversion of various hues to different > tones. > > The main reason for conversion to greyscale is not so much to reduce > file size, but rather to map colours in your image onto different > parts of the tonal range. The resulting image can still be an RGB file > or a greyscale file. Generally they should both appear and print the same. > > The least favoured way of conversion is the PS Convert to Greyscale. > Desaturation of an image is often an improvement but doeson't offer > much flexibility. Another method with more flexibility is using the PS > Channel Mixer although I don't find it very convenient to use. > Currently I often use the so-called Gorman technique. A PS script for > it and a number of other conversion techniques can be found here: > > http://www.atncentral.com/download.htm#BW_Conv > > Tom Moore > > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "fwaterlander" <frans2001@> wrote: > > > > "Conventional wisdom" for QTR seems to be to work in grayscale mode, > > but QTR also allows to work in and save in RGB mode. When I convert an > > RGB image to grayscale and apply Levels to set the black and white > > points, the resulting contrast is significantly less than when I stay > > in RGB mode, desaturate and apply Levels to set the black and white > > points. After Convert to Profile, save as tif and print with QTR this > > difference in contrast clearly shows in the prints. > > > > So my question is: why would I ever want to convert to grayscale mode > > given these results, particularly since all my images are in RGB mode > > to begin with. And yes, I can always increase contrast after converting > > to grayscale, but why do this in the first place? > > > > Because storage space is so cheap these days, the argument that the > > resulting grayscale files are smaller is not a very valid one in my > > opinion. > > > > Frans Waterlander > > >
Message
Re: Grayscale versus RGB mode - loss of contrast
2007-03-09 by Frans Waterlander
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.