Tom, There is indeed no loss of contrast when converting a desaturated image to grayscale, but there is a definite loss of contrast when converting an RGB color image to grayscale as compaired to desaturating an RGB image. So for an RGB image, it seems logical to me to NOT convert to grayscale but desaturate instead. That's my whole point here. Frans Waterlander --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Moore" <rtmlists8888@...> wrote: > > First, I have never noticed a loss of contrast when converting a > desaturated image to grayscale. Second, when the documentation was > written, QuadtoneRIP required a grayscale tiff as input. That has > since been relaxed. > > Tom Moore > > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Frans Waterlander" > <frans2001@> wrote: > > > > Tom, > > > > Thanks for your reply. I'm well aware of the different ways to > > convert an RGB image to grayscale mode. However, conversion to > > grayscale mode, at least to the best of my knowledge, causes a loss > > of contrast as compared to maintaining the RGB file as an RGB file > > and using Desaturate or Channel Mixer/Monochrome in Photoshop. So why > > does the QTR documentation suggest you convert to grayscale mode? QTR > > works just as well on RGB mode Desaturated or Channel > > Mixer/Monochrome images as long as you use Convert to Profile/QTR - > > RGB Matte Paper or /QTR - RGB Photo Paper before saving as tif. > > > > Frans Waterlander > > > > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Moore" <rtmlists8888@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Frans > > > > > > The issue of conversion from colour to B&W is a complex one that has > > > engendered many long debates and discussions. A companion list to > > this > > > one, DigitalBlackandWhitethePrint has had several useful discussions > > > on this point. Also, there are many tool for B&W conversion > > providing > > > many options for contrast and conversion of various hues to > > different > > > tones. > > > > > > The main reason for conversion to greyscale is not so much to reduce > > > file size, but rather to map colours in your image onto different > > > parts of the tonal range. The resulting image can still be an RGB > > file > > > or a greyscale file. Generally they should both appear and print > > the same. > > > > > > The least favoured way of conversion is the PS Convert to Greyscale. > > > Desaturation of an image is often an improvement but doeson't offer > > > much flexibility. Another method with more flexibility is using the > > PS > > > Channel Mixer although I don't find it very convenient to use. > > > Currently I often use the so-called Gorman technique. A PS script > > for > > > it and a number of other conversion techniques can be found here: > > > > > > http://www.atncentral.com/download.htm#BW_Conv > > > > > > Tom Moore > > > > > > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "fwaterlander" <frans2001@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > "Conventional wisdom" for QTR seems to be to work in grayscale > > mode, > > > > but QTR also allows to work in and save in RGB mode. When I > > convert an > > > > RGB image to grayscale and apply Levels to set the black and > > white > > > > points, the resulting contrast is significantly less than when I > > stay > > > > in RGB mode, desaturate and apply Levels to set the black and > > white > > > > points. After Convert to Profile, save as tif and print with QTR > > this > > > > difference in contrast clearly shows in the prints. > > > > > > > > So my question is: why would I ever want to convert to grayscale > > mode > > > > given these results, particularly since all my images are in RGB > > mode > > > > to begin with. And yes, I can always increase contrast after > > converting > > > > to grayscale, but why do this in the first place? > > > > > > > > Because storage space is so cheap these days, the argument that > > the > > > > resulting grayscale files are smaller is not a very valid one in > > my > > > > opinion. > > > > > > > > Frans Waterlander > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: Grayscale versus RGB mode - loss of contrast
2007-03-10 by Frans Waterlander
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.