Howard, I'm an plonker. I was indeed printing at 2880. When I went back to 1440 all is OK. I don't get more than 1.6 dMax at the moment but thats OK - will move to K6 or a K4+toner solution sooner rather than later now that I have overcome most of the dumb mistakes. Thanks indeed for your help and patience, --Kip --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Howard Shaw <glassman@...> wrote: > > Kip Cole wrote: > > Howard, thanks for the advice. The ink limit in the HPR curve I've > > been working from is 75%. When I measure around that point on a the > > ink limit calibration chart at 100% I get: > > > > Step L* > > 50 17.5 > > 55 17.8 > > 60 18.2 > > 65 18.4 > > 70 18.6 > > 75 18.8 ==> Chosen as ink limit > > 80 18.8 > > 85 19.0 > > 90 18.8 > > 95 19.4 > > 100 19.5 > > > > As you suggest, the 75% step is very close to the 80->100 steps, and > > the 70% step too. > > > > Based on this data, what ink limit would you try as a base. > > > > Cheers, --Kip > > > Kip > Those figures look a bit peculiar - they seem to go backwards which > would indicate over-inking. Are you printing at 1440 or 2880dpi? If at > 2880 you may want to drop the limit even more than the 55% you have > suggested in your other email. I don't use the UC inks but I would have > thought you should be able to achieve a better dmax than 1.59 on HPR. > Eboni ink typically gives 1.68-1.72. > > regards > Howard >
Message
Re: Density reversal in HPR curve at 95->100 step during curve creation
2007-03-28 by Kip Cole
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.