Roy Harrington wrote: > Ernst, > > When I first tried Qimage with QTR ICCs back over a year ago there were some > issues. The issue was a combination of both Qimage and Little CMS which is the > internal color management of Qimage. At the time we got things to work just > like they do Photoshop. I guess it's possible that it has been broken > in a later > version -- (I don't use Qimage on any regular basis so I wouldn't find > out about it). > > The whole BPC issue is a problem in general. It is not addressed in > the ICC standard > at all -- neither v2 or v4. To quote the website it's "under active > consideration". > Adobe is the one who initiated the concept and wrote the "standard" for it. > Another issue is that rendering intents are also up to implementers -- > the idea is > specified in ICC but the exact math involved is not. > > It's easy to see what your particular setup does. Instead of printing > the output of > Qimage (or any other program) send the output to a tiff file and open it up back > in Photoshop to see what's been done to it. Use a 21 stepwedge and look at the > histogram before and after -- or even just a 100% black box. > > Roy Roy, There's an older Qimage mailing list comment by Mike on BPC where he writes that BPC is not needed in perceptual rendering as the last already compresses the total within the printer's gamut. So he advises to keep BPC on in both perceptual (not doing harm) and relative colormetric (needed there for good shadow rendering). True if it works correctly but I see differences in Photoshop Perceptual rendering with and without BPC. In Qimage it certainly isn't inactive in the case I sketched. I rather print samples to really see and measure what I get than check it in PS that needs to be treated carefully as CM is almost never really suppressed in that program. Picture Window Pro's CM can be switched off totally, on the other hand that application has a quirky CM when switched on :-) I have been testing all the applications on QTR ICC compatibility probably two or three years ago and PWP made a mess of it then and now, Qimage is back to an old problem it seems but worse now as I want to print gloss with the higher Dmax. I'm going to measure the targets I got and select the method with the tone range that comes near the ideal curve for that Dmax. If the HP ABW sans application CM isn't too bad I might use that with Qimage for the time being, the QTR profile did correct the tone range though but I do not want to print from PS. Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Qimage BPC cutting Dmax ?
2007-06-18 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.