QTR-Quadtone RIP

--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, David Burren <david@...> wrote:
>
> Should I specifically NOT be trying to use 51-step targets for  
> linearisation?  I could use 21 steps for linearisation and 51 for  
> profiling, but that seems like a bit of a hack workaround...
> The 51-step target used in this instance was the 51x4-random one I  
> posted a link to yesterday, so most scanning errors should have been  
> averaged out.

I had similar experience with 51-step targets. In my case it was hard 
to make the first partitioning good enough to produce a linearization 
curve, when 51 steps are used. I mentioned this to Roy in e-mail and he 
agreed that 21-step target is more useable.

--Sergei