QTR-Quadtone RIP

If the strip read is giving you trouble, why not just read patches. We are
only talking about 21 steps here. It is not a 225 or 775 color target? Yes,
it should work but???   Do you have the sound turned on? I don't have an I1
right now but I did use one before. The hardest thing to get right WITHOUT
sound was strip reading. Man it was EASY when I learn that there was
supposed to be sound and turned it on. Worked great for music too!! Boss
didn't like it but hey, made work an ok place.    

 

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street

Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

http://e.neilsen.home.att.net

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

Skype ejprinter

  _____  

From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of ferdinand_paris
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 10:20 PM
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Which software for measuring?

 

I'm still having terrible trouble reading the test strip printout in
strip mode and would appreciate any tips on how to edit it so as to
make it easier to read.

Do people have any views about whether the i1 is more accurate in test
or patch mode? You can make the i1 fairly fast in patch mode by
putting it on an auto-delay. I'd have thought that when the i1 is
stationary it may get a better read, provided you position it
correctly. (However I'd hate to do colour profiling this way!)

F_P

--- In QuadtoneRIP@ <mailto:QuadtoneRIP%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com,
"ferdinand_paris"
<ferdinand_paris@...> wrote:
>
> Narrower? Like less wide, and not less high? So that each sample is
> roughly square? Is there any change that you could share this edited
> file?
> 
> Ferdinand
> 
> --- In QuadtoneRIP@ <mailto:QuadtoneRIP%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com, "johncjmd" <johncjmd@> wrote:
> >
> > I had the same problem with all the strips, so I edited them in
> > Photoshop to make them slightly narrower,and then the eyeone had 
> > no problems reading them. Might work for you.
> > John Jenkins
>

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]