Thanks for all the feedback. Some good points. @Eric: I have been reading the patches, because I have had little alternative. I have persisted in trying to get the strip reading working (with the sound on!) for several reasons. First, I had the impression that the 21x4 random file was the preferred file, so that's 84 readings. And I have been reading each printout twice to test for consistency (of my technique and/or the instrument), so this all adds up. Second, if my technique is ok, then I guess this is telling me something about the quality or the calibration of the newly acquired i1. I looked at the supplied test charts for PM5, and compared them to the charts for i1 Match. The PM5 ones all had gaps between each square. I created a version of the 21*4 chart with gaps and .... it didn't help. I'm about ready to give up with strip reading, although I was still hoping that John Jenkins might offer to share his version. At least Paul's report that patch reading seems more consistent is reassuring. Thanks for that. F_P
Message
Re: Which software for measuring?
2007-12-19 by ferdinand_paris
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.