QTR-Quadtone RIP

that's too bad. When I saw that ACE had been made available I was encouraged. But 
ErgoSoft is not giving access to any external CMS choice either, so for me it's been a non-
event.
T

--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "E Neilsen" <e.neilsen2@...> wrote:
>
> Tyler, Mike doesn't even like us to mention the word Adobe on the Qimage
> yahoo group. I don't think he'd be too keen on doing much to help us. 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Eric
> 
>  
> 
> Eric Neilsen Photo
> 
> 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9
> 
> Dallas, TX 75226
> 
> 214 827-8301
> 
>  
> 
> http://ericneilsenphotography.com
> 
> SKype ejprinter
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Tyler Boley
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 2:29 PM
> To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Qimage BPC cutting Dmax ?
> 
>  
> 
> --- In QuadtoneRIP@ <mailto:QuadtoneRIP%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com,
> "Roy Harrington" <roy@> wrote:
> ...
> > It's very weird to me that different CMSs with exactly the same
> input can
> > produce
> > different results.
> 
> Roy, yes, but they do. I remember when there seemed to be several
> selections, Heidleburg (SP?), Kodak, Agfa, Imation, then ACE came
> along, sometimes they'd do slightly different conversions.
> 
> The news didn't seem to sweep the planet, but Adobe actually released
> ACE as installable on it's own, both platforms, including BPC
> implementation, to be accessable to apps that give cms aoptions.
> Perhaps the Qimage developers could take a look at making that
> selectable, I wish Ergosoft would.
> Tyler
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>