On Jan 8, 2008 2:04 AM, Olivier <odesmais@...> wrote: > > OK, the conversion to the QTR printer profile does about > > the same to the tonal range of the image. > > The linearity of the printer isn't changed but the tone > > range of the image is adapted in the conversion to that > > profile for what is possible in tone range on that paper. > > But I see you got that idea already. > > Fine, but the way it's done I'm not so sure. > I'm having a desperate time trying to properly output MPS K7 on glossy > media. > I somehow managed (finally) a proper linearization using the 51 > stepwedge, but when the profile is created and used with percep. w/ BPC- > on in CS3 to convert the piezography.psd target, the > 100/99/98/97/96/95% patches get clustered together in a > 100/99/99/99/98/98% ramp given a L*14.5 Dmax. What this leads to is a > blocked shadow area at the end of the greyscale. > Perceptual intent compresses the tonal range but here the compression > is very agressive. > Olivier > > Olivier and others, With a weak dMax, yes the shadows are compressed somewhat -- that's inevitable. But your mentioning only the K values of the ramp you are using misses the point that it's the L values that are important. Color Management is all about L-values. If you happen to have a GrayGamma 2.2 stepwedge then K=100 gives L=0 but K=95 gives L=1. So the difference between K=100 to K=95 is already very small -- only 1 unit of L. It's the stepwedge itself that is very compressed in the shadow area. (don't fall into the trap: "but it's untagged and I said no color management". If you look at L values or you Convert-to-Profile, remember the file ALWAYS inherits the working space) "Thinking in color management" requires a switch in concept from thinking K (or RGB) values to Lab values. This really is the crux of the issue with CM discussions. It's a "light-bulb" moment. Virtually all stepwedges are evenly spaced in K values but not necessarily even in L values. So any CM discussion of values MUST MUST MUST include the L values or the profile that is being used so one can convert. Roy [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: Creating ICC Profiles to improve Epson ABW
2008-01-08 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.