--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla <E.Dinkla@...> wrote: ... > Again, there's more to gain in my opinion with multiple > readings of more random linearisation targets that are > printed at two angles to the print direction and building > the linearisation on the average of the measurements. Same > for the QTR profile. Ernst, I have no experience on this matter specifically, but thought you might find this interesting. When some of us met Bill Atkinson, he had done exhaustive tests with regard to measurement. His findings were that series of readings with the least possible difference from one patch to the next gave consistently more accurate results than random patch strips. So he ordered his charts accordingly. Of course this was for color profiling, and large charts, and I suspect the differences were small, but there you are for what it's worth... Tyler
Message
Re: Iterative linearization
2008-01-16 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.