QTR-Quadtone RIP

> You could have a point that correction on the overlaps may 
> not work out as needed but I think the QTR linearisation on 
> the partitioned channels total as theoretically better than 
> calibrating individual channels and the partitioning done 
> after that like happens on my Z3100. 

To clear misunderstanding, I don't mean QTR linearization routine is 
any better or worse than others. It's simply that there's to my 
knowledge no modelling of overlapping densities. So one can not treat 
a multiple density output as a single density output.

>Of course when iterative measuring is 
> implanted in QTR's linearisation this should mean finer 
> adjustment on the output if the adjustment was not fine 
> enough already. Roy is the one qualified to give an answer 
> on that but he was already qualified when he wrote that 
> linearisation tool so I guess it must be working correctly.

I tried a double linearizeation in QTR without output, just 
evaluating the curve graph : it looks like it works.

Olivier