> What are your feelings at this point concerning the ColorMunki and the > the PrintFixPro suite. I noticed that you do not include the > ProntFixPro in your chart of Consumer vs fine Art devices. Hi That chart is from X-rite so wouldn't have the PFP in it ;-) I normally never do direct comparisons myself, since without knowing someone's personal preferences/requirements I don't think they are always terribly helpful. Both can produce good profiles, however the Datacolor solution allows for a lot more 'tinkering' or adjustment of how you make your profiles. In some ways they are aimed at different markets. The CM works well with its supplied software (with a few minor issues ;-) but currently if you want a more advanced solution from X-Rite then it's a rather more expensive i1 solution you'll need. The SpyderPrint software has been updated recently and supports the original PFP hardware. Making a choice depends on how much you want to spend and what level of functionality you are looking for. I know that some find the need to measure individual patches with the PFP a lot of hassle, whilst other people find it no bother at all. As someone who has been writing and doing talks about colour management for a while I suspect that the arrival of the CM will benefit both X-Rite and Datacolor and raise general awareness of the topic (and since it's a particular interest of mine, of B/W printing too ;-) bye for now Keith Cooper
Message
Re: ColorMunki and QTR?
2008-04-13 by Keith Cooper
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.