> The rest of your method sounds okay with the possible exception of the black boost of 100. That will probably be overinking but will be restricted to the very deepest blacks. > > Howard Howard, Thank you for your comment about overinking. Looking more closely at QTR distributed profiles for Epson 4000, I see a "rule of thumb" that WARM profiles have Black Boost +10 above Default Ink limit... and that COOL profiles boost only +5... presumably because cools mix in some LC/LM and try to avoid overinking by reducing Black Boost. Following that rule of thumb, I constructed/measured/printed additional Crane Museo Silver Rag curves: Curve BlackBoost LClimit LMlimit dMax Warm1 0 0 0 2.10 Warm2 100 0 0 2.25 Warm3 60 0 0 2.13 Cool2 100 12 12 2.26 Cool4 55 18 18 2.11 The numbers suggest that Black Boost swamps LC/LM Limit for dMax. The 21-step plots - IN TERMS OF 95/100 PERCEPTUAL TRANSITION - suggest that Warm2 and Warm3 are identical... and that Cool2 and Cool4 are identical. The circular gradients of Keith Cooper's B&W test image suggest that Warm2 beats Warm3... and that Cool2 beats Cool 4 (i.e., Black Boost 100 creates a smoother gradient than +10/+5 over Default Ink Limit). Are these observations due to aberrant Epson 4000 behavior on glossy papers? DO Epson 4000 UC/K2 inks behave quite differently on matte papers? As a retired scientist/engineer, I'd really welcome some solid theory and supporting evidence for what to measure and observe. Any ideas? As always, thanks in advance for your patience and considered opinions. Michael Miller MiloGiacomoRambaldi@... Atlanta, GA
Message
Re: K and LK ink limits?
2008-04-24 by milogiacomorambaldi47
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.