--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Howard Shaw <glassman@...> wrote: > However, using that method can produce bad results unless you are you > prepared to undertake a lot of testing. I was afraid you'd say that. > Roy's suggestion of taking a preexisting curve for a similar paper (in > particular find one with similar ink limit characteristics) and > applying an icc profile to it is a very good one which will likely > save you a lot of time. I agree. My problem is that I'm trying to create a curve for Epson VFA on a 2100, and there isn't a pre-existing curve. As a first step I'm trying to do it for Epson Enhanced Matte, which most of us use as a proofing paper. I'm doing this because, like a number of people, I find that the supplied Cone 2880 curve is putting down too much ink, and putting waves into the paper. Also EEnhMatte is a lot cheaper to experiment with. I could probably solve the problem with EEnhMatte by setting certain parameters in QTRGui, but the VFA problem remains. Regards Ferdinand
Message
Re: Comparing Cone's K7 curves with those produced by QTR curve creation tool.
2008-05-04 by ferdinand_paris
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.