Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Message

Re: Which is better - Convert Color to BW or Shoot BW?

2008-06-24 by jlk4410

--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Native Texan Photographer" <dhedgpeth@...> 
wrote:
>
> Hilly, 
> you accidentally put your question in another persons post.  I don't
> know the answer myself, but would be interested in finding out.  My
> guess would be to shoot in color and then convert to BW.  I would
> assume that Photoshop would give you better tonal range, and QTR would
> allow a better print.  However, I'm not positive about digital, and I
> haven't shot BW for over 20 years.
> 
> Uncle Dannie
> 
> 
> --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "hillary_555" <hillary_555@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > hi,
> > i'm trying to make b/w pictures....may some one help me to guide,
> > which one is better to take color picture and then to be converted 
> > to b/w or to swicth on b/w mode since the beginning...
> > 
> > rgds
> > hilly
> > http://innerbeauty-owners.blogspot.com/
> >
>
Shooting B&W film is still a joy for me, and I like the results. I use an Imacon to scan my 
negs then print with QTR. I also shoot color digital & convert to B&W using Gerg Gorman's
PS action ( http://www.gormanphotography.com/bw_conversion.pdf). Both of these 
processes were arrived at after trial & error. My suggestion would be to look at B&W 
prints, the tone & timbre of which you like, and work to achieve that 'look' & feel.
And take good notes!
Best,
Julian Kaiser

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.