Roy, Thanks for this explanation : I never bothered to think about the gray color setting in PS which is a mistake. I'll take an other chance to properly set my workflow. Apparently "grey : dot 15%" is equivalent to a 1,51 gamma. The stepwedge is no tagged, but at creation time it had to have a working space, am I correct assuming it had a grey 1.8 gamma ? This is just for informative purpose : I would just like to measure the actual output of the stepwedge once QTR-ICC-profiled by applying a proper working space for conversion (I guess it is useless for actual editing-printing). Working under Windows and in RVB color space for BW transformation (though ultimately PS grey mode is used for space saving sake) when editing and both being gamma 2.2, I plan to now set grey at gamma 2.2 : minimum conversion should now take place. Does this make sense ? Last, I haven't followed you at all on BPC : 1. before converting to QTR-ICC profile and when soft-profing I go "personalised" and check perceptual/BPC/white paper simul. which also turns on black. What you mean is that black is not simulated ? 2. the correct procedure would be (also before converting to QTR ICC profile) soft-proofing->personalised-> QTR-ICC name and check perceptual then no BPC and white paper (+ de facto Black) ? Do you suggest any alternative soft-proofing procedure ? Thanks for your help. Olivier
Message
Re: Still QTR ICC understanding (again)
2005-08-08 by odesmais
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.