Hi Jason. Given the info you presented, it looks to me as if you may have erred on the 3 lighter inks. Their limits ought to be about 13.3 on each and they are about 7.5% of the K density where you have only 3.xxx for them. I believe the curve creator thinks it is blending much lighter inks than they actually are as w3ell as putting down more of them(eg:45% limit total). Remember that all ink densities are listed in the boxes in relation to the 100% or K ink. You appear to have done that with the C & M but not with the Y,LC,LM. Hope this is helpful. Regards, Duane --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Jason" <hirsch@...> wrote: > > Good Evening- > > I'll preface this with a statement I've always believed: Color > Management is (fairly) easy. Today I'm learning it's not. I'm a former > Kodak Professional employee who lived and breathed it- and now I'm > choking on it :) > > That said: > My worksheet is at http://www.gotSheep.com/ICC/21target_QuadRip_BW.xls > <http://www.gotSheep.com/ICC/21target_QuadRip_BW.xls> . For those > concerned about XLS files, the graph I created is here: > http://www.gotSheep.com/ICC/DensityChart.pdf > <http://www.gotSheep.com/ICC/DensityChart.pdf> > > I purchased a set of UT2 inks. After finally getting them loaded into > the R280 printer (auto-reset chips aren't working right) I printed off > the calibration chart in QTR. Eyeballing the chart I modified the ink > slider to 40%, then printed the chart again. With that new chart in > hand I created a spectrolino calibration target and read the values in. > Said data is present on sheet one in the XLS file- all spectral data, > XYZ, LAB, and Density is present. Paper white is 0 (1A). > > You'll note that the data rounds off on the black at 1.71, and continues > to build on the greys up to the max the printed put down at 40% > (1.34/1.07). > > That said: I should have all the data I need to create the printing > curve in QTR, but when I do so it's ... well, black cat, coal mine, > midnight, 25 speed film. The 21 step wedge prints 1 step- 0- as white, > and then becomes quite dark (eyeball: 1,0 density) at the 2nd wedge. > > My curve I created is here at: > http://www.gotSheep.com/ICC/R280_RedRiver_PolarMatte_UT2_BW_mod2.qidf > <http://www.gotSheep.com/ICC/R280_RedRiver_PolarMatte_UT2_BW_mod2.qidf> > > In it I go through the calculations to map LK to B for Cyan/Magenta > (copy the curve from) (seen here: > http://www.gotSheep.com/ICC/CurveCreator.png > <http://www.gotSheep.com/ICC/CurveCreator.png> ), whereas the resultant > curve looks like this: <http://www.gotSheep.com/ICC/RRcurves.png> > http://www.gotSheep.com/ICC/RRcuves.png > <http://www.gotSheep.com/ICC/RRcuves.png> > > Now, believing myself to be a fairly intelligent individual that used to > *design* color management systems for sites... having read all the > available tutorials on the subject... and lastly really wanting to see a > single print look decent, could I trouble one member to point me in a > direction that will stop me from pounding my head into the fresh drywall > in the nursery? > > Thanks in advance- > > Jason > > (The image I'm dying to print is here- > http://purduephotog.deviantart.com/art/IR-Tahoe-Meadow-92211698 > <http://purduephotog.deviantart.com/art/IR-Tahoe-Meadow-92211698> - a > 35 frame IR panorama taken in Reno with a home-made modified 300D Rebel) > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: New User UT2 / QTR setup problems / Red River Polar Matte
2008-09-09 by dlruckus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.